Punjab provincial guide
PRA E-IMS Punjab: who must comply
What restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls in Punjab have to do now that PRA is enforcing — and how it differs from FBR digital invoicing. eInvoicePro submits to both.

The distinction that matters
E-IMS is provincial, and it covers services
Sales tax on services in Pakistan is a provincial subject. The Punjab Revenue Authority administers it in Punjab under the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012, and the rules under that Act are made under its section 76. E-IMS — the Electronic Invoice Monitoring System — is PRA's system for watching those services being invoiced.
That single sentence resolves most of the confusion. FBR digital invoicing and PRA E-IMS are not two names for one obligation, two phases of one rollout, or a federal system with a provincial front end. They are different systems, run by different authorities, under different statutes, with different servers, different payload formats and different numbers coming back. Meeting one has no effect on the other.
The practical consequence is unglamorous and expensive: a business whose supplies straddle both can end up transmitting the same transaction twice, to two places, in two formats, and printing two sets of identifiers. That is a real operating cost, and it is worth knowing about before a POS contract is signed rather than after.
Punjab's headline sales tax rate on services is 16%, the same as Islamabad. Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan are at 15%. Punjab restaurants are reported to be at a reduced rate — treat that as approximate and get the figure that applies to your own category confirmed, because the rate on a restaurant bill is one of the few things a customer will notice and dispute.
Two systems, not one
FBR digital invoicing and PRA E-IMS
They are separate systems under separate laws. Being compliant with one says nothing about the other.
FBR digital invoicing
- Run by the Federal Board of Revenue
- Federal law
- Invoice transmitted to FBR's system, which returns an FBR invoice number
- The QR code on the buyer's copy is built from FBR's response
- Phase-in dates were set by notification and have passed
PRA E-IMS
- Run by the Punjab Revenue Authority
- Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012, rule-making power in section 76
- POS sends invoice data to PRA's server in SFD format, and PRA returns a fiscal invoice number
- The receipt must carry the PRA QR code, the business name, the business address and the receipt number
- Threshold is annual income of Rs 6 million or more
Scope
Who has to install E-IMS
The threshold. Businesses with annual income of Rs 6 million or more must install EIMS. That figure was lowered from Rs 10 million, and the lowering dates to 2024 — it is not one of the August 2026 changes, and any article presenting it as new is describing an old change.
The categories named in the current enforcement are restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls. Those four are the ones covered by the 10 August 2026 ban on handwritten receipts.
Salons and beauty parlours are worth a separate paragraph, because they are the category most often mis-stated. Beauty parlours do appear on a published list of notified categories — but that list belongs to FBR's draft SRO 288(I)/2026, a federal income tax instrument that is not in force, and not to the PRA enforcement described here. Do not read the SRO 288 category list as a PRA scope list.
The threshold is expressed as annual income rather than turnover or taxable supplies. Those are not the same measure, and for a restaurant they can differ substantially. Three questions follow, and a multi-site operator needs all three answered before budgeting: what "annual income" means here and over what period, whether the threshold is assessed per registered business or per premises, and whether a business that grows past Rs 6 million mid-year must install immediately or from the following period. Put them to PRA or your adviser in writing.
This is not a new obligation being introduced. In 2024 PRA issued show-cause notices to more than 100 restaurants for non-compliance. Businesses treating August 2026 as the start of the requirement are two years late to it.
Enforcement, not a new rule
What PRA actually did, and when
The obligation predates all of this. What changed in August 2026 is how hard it is being enforced.
-
Threshold lowered to Rs 6 million
The requirement to install EIMS was extended down from businesses with annual income of Rs 10 million to those with Rs 6 million or more. This is a 2024 change, frequently and wrongly reported as part of the 2026 drive.
-
Show-cause notices to 100+ restaurants
PRA issued show-cause notices to more than 100 restaurants for non-compliance. Enforcement against this obligation is not new; its intensity is.
-
PRA Notification 2026_01
Food Delivery Platforms / Third Party Delivery Service Providers as 'Collecting Agent'. If your sales reach customers through a delivery platform, this notification is the one to read alongside your E-IMS position.
-
Province-wide zero tolerance
PRA adopted a zero tolerance enforcement policy for E-IMS across Punjab, with district commissioners tasked with enforcement.
-
Handwritten receipts banned
Handwritten receipts were banned across Punjab for restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls. A handwritten slip is now a defect on its face, before anyone examines what is printed on it.
The printed receipt
What is confirmed, and what is not
Four elements are stated. Everything else about the layout of the receipt is worth confirming before you commit a print template across every outlet.
Must appear on the receipt
- The business name
- The business address
- The receipt number
- The PRA QR code
Not established — confirm before you print
- Whether the fiscal invoice number returned by PRA is the same thing as the receipt number, or a separate field that must also be printed
- Where on the receipt each element has to sit, and at what minimum size
- Whether the QR code has a specified size, error-correction level or encoded payload format
- Whether an emailed, SMS or in-app receipt satisfies the requirement, or only a printed one
- Whether any element must appear in Urdu as well as English
- What a duplicate or reprinted receipt must show
Exposure
What not issuing an EIMS receipt costs
The penalty attaches to the receipt, not to the accounting. A sale that was properly recorded in your books and properly returned still exposes you if the customer walked out with the wrong piece of paper.
- Rs 400,000
- Lower end of the penalty for not issuing an EIMS receipt
- Rs 1,000,000
- Upper end of the same penalty
- 1 month
- Maximum period premises may be sealed on repeat violations
District commissioners were tasked with enforcement under the August 2026 policy. Exposure depends on your own facts and on how a particular default is characterised — confirm your position with a qualified tax adviser rather than relying on a range.
For a POS vendor
The handshake
The integration itself is short enough to state in four steps:
- The POS captures the sale as it normally would.
- The POS transmits the invoice data to PRA's server in SFD format.
- PRA returns a fiscal invoice number.
- The receipt is printed carrying the business name, the business address, the receipt number and the PRA QR code.
That is the whole shape of it, and it is the same shape as the federal system — send, get a number back, print what came back. The difference is everything underneath: a different server, a different format, and a different number.
The four steps above are what can be stated from public sources. PRA does not publish the rest openly, which is why so few systems connect to it — and it is the list to put to any vendor before you sign, because a vendor who cannot answer these has not built against E-IMS:
- What SFD expands to, and where its field-level schema is published.
- The endpoint, the authentication model, and how a business obtains E-IMS credentials.
- Whether PRA provides a test or sandbox environment before a POS goes live.
- The offline behaviour — what a POS must do when PRA's server is unreachable mid-service, whether receipts may be issued and queued, and how long a queued invoice may sit before it is a default. In a restaurant at 9pm this is the single most important question here.
- PRA's published error strings and rejection codes, and what the cashier should see.
- Retention requirements for transmitted invoice data, and in what form PRA may demand it.
Neighbouring provinces vary in how much of this they publish. KPRA documents its RIMS API openly, which is a useful reference point for what a provincial integration specification looks like — but it is KP's system, not Punjab's, and nothing in it can be assumed to hold for E-IMS. Sindh operates under the Sindh Sales Tax Special Procedure (Online Integration of Business) Rules and Balochistan under its own equivalent. Four provinces, four systems.
What we hear
Where the two systems get confused
These three come up in nearly every conversation with a Punjab hospitality operator.
We are already integrated with FBR, so Punjab is covered.
They are separate systems under separate laws. FBR digital invoicing is federal; PRA E-IMS runs under the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012. Compliance with one is not compliance with the other, and a Punjab restaurant can be inside both at the same time.
E-IMS is the provincial version of SRO 288.
It is a different instrument, under a different law. SRO 288(I)/2026 is a draft FBR instrument amending the Income Tax Rules 2002, and it is not in force. PRA — along with SRB, KPRA and BRA — formally opposed it in March 2026, citing regulatory duplication. Your own provincial regulator is on record objecting to it.
One POS, one integration, and we are done.
Two servers, two payload formats and two identifiers coming back: an FBR invoice number on the federal side and a fiscal invoice number from PRA. Ask any vendor which of the two they actually connect to, and get the answer in writing before you sign.
Federal, and still a draft
SRO 288(I)/2026 should be read as a draft
Status. SRO 288(I)/2026, dated 18 February 2026, is a draft substitution of Chapter VIIA ("Online Integration of Businesses") of the Income Tax Rules, 2002, issued for public comment. On the reading published by KPMG it becomes enforceable only after two further steps: FBR issues a final notification, and an Income Tax General Order specifies implementation timelines and modalities. Some trade press has reported it as though it were already final. The status is unresolved, and while it remains a draft there is no compliance date to work back from.
We are covering it here because Punjab hospitality operators keep encountering it, usually presented as a deadline. Until a final notification and an Income Tax General Order exist, there is no date to work to.
What the draft contemplates is nonetheless worth knowing, because it would land on many of the same businesses:
- A long list of notified categories, including restaurants, hostels, motels, guest houses, marriage halls, marquees, clubs including race clubs, inter-city road transport operators, courier and cargo services, beauty parlours, clinics, slimming clinics, massage centres, dentists, physiotherapists, plastic surgeons, hair transplant surgeons, veterinary doctors, pathological laboratories, diagnostic centres covering X-ray, CT and MRI, private hospitals, health clubs, gyms, fitness centres, swimming pools, photographers, videographers, event managers, accountants, retailers including manufacturer-cum-retailer, wholesaler-cum-retailer and importer-cum-retailer, foreign exchange dealers and exchange companies, private schools, colleges, universities and vocational training institutes, and online sellers and online marketplaces.
- CCTV cameras at points of sale, with recordings retained for at least one month and produced to the Commissioner on demand.
- An integrator licensing regime: a five-year non-transferable licence from the Board, minimum paid-up capital of Rs 10 million, registration with PSEB or ICAP, audited financial statements for the last three years, and undertakings of no involvement in fiscal fraud or blacklisting.
In March 2026 the provincial revenue authorities — SRB, PRA, KPRA and BRA — formally opposed SRO 288, asking FBR not to finalise it without consultation and citing regulatory duplication. The Balochistan Revenue Authority asked for a delay. The duplication they object to is precisely the federal/provincial overlap this page opens with.
Plan on the E-IMS obligation, which is real and being enforced now. Do not spend capital against SRO 288 as though it were in force, and be sceptical of any vendor quoting you a compliance date for it.
Federal tax credit
The 10% credit under section 64D
Integration spend on the federal side may attract a credit. Whether provincial spend does is not settled.
What section 64D gives
The Finance Act 2026, effective 1 July 2026, inserted section 64D into the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. It provides a tax credit equal to 10% of the amount invested in eligible electronic resources: the purchase, acquisition, installation and implementation of equipment, hardware, software and other electronic components directly used to integrate with FBR's digital platform.
Who qualifies
Any person required, under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Sales Tax Act 1990 or the Federal Excise Act 2005, to integrate with FBR's computerised systems for real-time production monitoring or electronic recording and reporting of sales and receipts. The credit is available only in the tax year in which the electronic resources are installed, integrated and fully configured — all three.
What is excluded
Operational, maintenance and recurring expenses are excluded. The credit applies only against normal tax liability under Division I or Division II of Part I of the First Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, and FBR may prescribe further conditions and restrictions. Carry-forward treatment is not established, so do not build a model that assumes an unused credit survives into the next year.
The E-IMS question
Read the qualifying trigger closely. It is an obligation to integrate with FBR's computerised systems under three federal statutes, and the eligible spend is described as directly used to integrate with FBR's digital platform. The Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 is not among those statutes. On the face of the provision, hardware bought purely to satisfy PRA E-IMS does not obviously qualify, and we have found nothing settling the point. If a single POS will serve both obligations, ask your adviser how to apportion the cost before you sign the purchase invoice, not at filing time.
Three other Finance Act 2026 changes are worth knowing while you are in this territory. FBR was empowered to de-register or blacklist businesses that fail to integrate with the e-invoicing system. Penalties for non-compliance were substantially increased. And faceless administration was introduced through a National Faceless Center for audits, assessments and appeals — which means that if something does go wrong on the federal side, the person handling it is unlikely to be someone in your city.
One system, both authorities
eInvoicePro submits to FBR and to PRA E-IMS from the same counter — one workflow, two authorities, no second system to run alongside it.
This month
What to do now
Four steps that do not depend on any of the open questions above being answered first.
Establish which authority you answer to
Work out, with your adviser, which of your supplies are provincial services and which are federal. Everything else follows from that split, and no vendor can make it for you.
Check yourself against the threshold
Annual income of Rs 6 million or more triggers the EIMS requirement. If you are near the line, get the measure and the period confirmed in writing.
Stop issuing handwritten receipts
Since 10 August 2026 they are banned across Punjab for restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls. This one needs no further clarification to act on.
Put the open questions to PRA in writing
The receipt layout, the offline behaviour and the credentials process all need answers before a rollout. Ask now, so the answers arrive before the print run rather than after.
Key takeaways
- E-IMS is provincial and covers Punjab sales tax on services — FBR digital invoicing is federal and neither substitutes for the other
- The threshold is annual income of Rs 6 million or more, lowered from Rs 10 million back in 2024 rather than in 2026
- Since 10 August 2026 handwritten receipts are banned across Punjab for restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls
- A compliant receipt carries the business name, the business address, the receipt number and the PRA QR code
- Not issuing an EIMS receipt carries Rs 400,000 to Rs 1,000,000, and repeat violations risk the premises being sealed for up to a month
FAQ
PRA E-IMS questions
The questions Punjab hospitality operators ask most often.
Is PRA E-IMS the same as FBR digital invoicing?
No. E-IMS is the Punjab Revenue Authority's Electronic Invoice Monitoring System for Punjab sales tax on services under the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012. FBR digital invoicing is federal. They are different systems, run by different authorities, under different statutes, with different servers and different identifiers coming back. Being compliant with one says nothing about the other.
Who has to install E-IMS in Punjab?
Businesses with annual income of Rs 6 million or more must install EIMS. That threshold was lowered from Rs 10 million in 2024, not in 2026. The categories named in the current enforcement drive are restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls.
Can a restaurant in Punjab still write receipts by hand?
No. Since 10 August 2026 handwritten receipts have been banned across Punjab for restaurants, hotels, coffee shops and marriage halls. A handwritten slip is a defect on its face, before anyone examines what is printed on it.
What must a compliant EIMS receipt show?
Four elements are stated: the business name, the business address, the receipt number and the PRA QR code. Layout, sizing and whether a digital receipt satisfies the requirement are not established and should be confirmed before a print template is rolled out across outlets.
What is the penalty for not issuing an EIMS receipt?
Between Rs 400,000 and Rs 1,000,000. Repeat violations may result in the premises being sealed for up to one month. District commissioners were tasked with enforcement under the August 2026 policy.
How does the integration work for a POS vendor?
The POS captures the sale, transmits the invoice data to PRA in SFD format, PRA returns a fiscal invoice number, and the receipt is printed carrying the business name, address, receipt number and PRA QR code. The endpoint, authentication model, sandbox availability and offline behaviour are not published and should be obtained from PRA directly.
Is FBR's SRO 288 of 2026 in force?
It is a draft. SRO 288(I)/2026, dated 18 February 2026, is a draft substitution of Chapter VIIA of the Income Tax Rules 2002, issued for public comment. On the reading published by KPMG it becomes enforceable only after FBR issues a final notification and an Income Tax General Order specifying timelines. Some trade press has reported it as final. The status is unresolved.
Continue
Related guides
What is FBR digital invoicing?
The federal obligation, in plain English — what it is, who it applies to and what changes day to day.
Read morePRA E-IMS software
What running PRA and FBR from one counter looks like, and how to check whether you are in scope.
Read moreDeadlines & notifications
The federal phase-in dates and the notifications that set them.
Read moreDo you need both?
Where the federal and provincial obligations overlap, and which of the two is in force today.
Read moreReady to simplify your FBR digital invoicing?
Join 2000+ businesses using eInvoicePro for real-time FBR integration and automated tax compliance.